Bank Disintermediation
By Mark Johnson, CEO Receipt Reliance
Some time ago, Jim Marous from The Financial Brand wrote a great article titled “5
Ways Mint.com Is Stealing Your Customers” and cleverly demonstrated how a
product like Mint could over time disintermediate the banks, doing so right
under their gaze, rendering them to nothing more than useful backend plumbing.
They would become mere utilities.
Banks in Australia and overseas are now offering new APIs
to third-party developers/providers. For example, according to an itnews article (ANZ
Bank opens up its mainframe) , ANZ "has
opened up its mainframe with around 20 new application programming interfaces
(APIs) tapping directly into its two main core banking applications”.
In another article from banking technology, (Deutsche
Bank opens data store to developers), Deutsche
Bank "is opening its data store to software developers from Germany and
abroad as it looks for more digital solutions for its bank clients”.
European banks are now obligated under new PSD2
guidelines to provide for API access of financial data to third-parties, having
two years from Jan '16 to comply. Banks in Australia will do so at the RBA
behest, and also to take advantage of the NPP, particularly the overlay
(convenience) services being introduced as part of the rollout (Read more about NPP here)
So here in lies a dilemma for banks; while there are many
types of third-party apps enabled via open
APIs that will enhance the banks' appeal to customers and facilitate as yet
undiscovered utility and convenience services, there will also be those that
can lead down the mint.com path as described via the link above.
Do banks resist the third-party invasion of “mint” type
products by restricting the level of access, by hiding behind regulatory bushes
or by discriminating? I hope not, as going negative will usually fail.
Or do banks roll their
sleeves up and utilise some of that capital they have and compete? I think this is the most likely outcome and indeed that is what we are starting to see
happen.
I imagine banks will become great aggregators for
customers who have accounts with more than one bank and will provide useful, intuitive
and contextual PFM front end tools for them. I imagine they will have the
resources to invest in IP or purchase necessary IP protection, hire the right
skills and expertise and will ultimately out-compete the majority of third-
party start-ups.
Perhaps banks will lose some of their traditional revenue
to these third-parties, but there will also be opportunity to introduce new
revenue streams for new services they can provide around payments.
Those third-party start-ups that do succeed will do so
via a killer app or two that is IP protected or is difficult to reverse
engineer. Over time many of these apps may eventually be bought by the banks
anyway and the status quo will return. Some disruptors will be successful, but
for the most part banks will have out disrupted the disruptors and hopefully the
real winners will be the banks' customers.
Footnote:
David Birch, a highly respected and followed commentator
and advisor in the payments industry and world expert on digital identity suggests
that in 2026 banks will be a place you store your digital identity, not your
money. If this is true then banks are in for a busy but very exciting period in
their history.
No comments:
Post a Comment